Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200U outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200U is 1862 days newer than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
- Performs up to 21% better in FIFA 23 than Celeron G1820 - 116 vs 96 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Celeron G1820 - 15 vs 53 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81352 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
63.354838709677416%
Multi-Core
825
55.40631296171927%
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Celeron |
Picasso | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |