Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 1132 days older than Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 6% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Ryzen 3 3200G - 74 vs 70 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 16 vs 4 threads
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
74
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€182.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €182.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78248 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Picasso | Codename | Broadwell-E |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |