Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 2498 days newer than Core i3-3240.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 3% better in Death Stranding than Core i3-3240 - 221 vs 214 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 55 vs 65 Watts
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen 3 3200G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Core i3-3240
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3240
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
554
52.661596958174904%
Multi-Core
1137
37.736475273813475%
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Picasso | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 55 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
