Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 696 days older than Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 1% better in Sons Of The Forest than Ryzen 3 3200G - 99 vs 98 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 32 vs 4 threads
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 3 3200G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 3 3200G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1052
89.83774551665243%
Multi-Core
3013
39.96551266746253%
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
|---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Picasso | Codename | Whitehaven |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
