Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 752 days newer than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 5% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron G4900 - 159 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3100 - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
159
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€177.47
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €177.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18484 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Celeron |
Matisse | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |