Buy on Amazon
€72.66
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 2300X outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 2300X is 2107 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2300X
- Performs up to 3% better in Stray than Celeron G1610 - 182 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 2300X - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 2300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Intel Celeron G1610
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76182 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen 3 2300X
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
35.35269709543569%
Multi-Core
739
22.36682808716707%
AMD Ryzen 3 2300X | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 55 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
