Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KS outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 2200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KS is 1513 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i9-12900KS - €122.81 vs €487.12
- Up to 71% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i9-12900KS - €0.24 vs €0.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KS
- Performs up to 12% better in World of Tanks than Ryzen 3 2200G - 580 vs 520 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 24 vs 4 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
520
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€122.81
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €122.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
FPS
580
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.84/FPS
28%
Price, €
€487.12
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for €487.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KS |
---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 5th, 2022 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 150 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |