Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 2200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 808 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - €122.81 vs €436.41
- Up to 70% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i9-10900 - €0.24 vs €0.8 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 4% better in World of Tanks than Ryzen 3 2200G - 543 vs 520 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 20 vs 4 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
520
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€122.81
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €122.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
Buy for €436.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |