Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 2200G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 2200G is 405 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Performs up to 4% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Celeron G3930 - 237 vs 227 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 59% cheaper than Ryzen 3 2200G - €50.95 vs €122.81
- Up to 58% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Ryzen 3 2200G - €0.22 vs €0.52 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 51 vs 65 Watts
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
237
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
42%
Price, €
€122.81
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for €122.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
227
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€50.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €50.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 135 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Celeron |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |