Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 1300X outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 1300X is 2115 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
- Performs up to 5% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-6100 - 133 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1300X - 6 vs 4 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 3 1300X
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | FX |
| Summit Ridge | Codename | Zambezi |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
