Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 1200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 1200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 530 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 1200.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1200
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - €140.52 vs €455.01
- Up to 64% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-9900KF - €0.28 vs €0.77 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 17% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen 3 1200 - 594 vs 507 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1200 - 16 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
507
85%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€140.52
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €140.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 218 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
594
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.77/FPS
36%
Price, €
€455.01
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for €455.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 218 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KF |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |