Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 1200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 1200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 1008 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 1200.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1200
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - €140.52 vs €311.74
- Up to 50% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Core i9-10900KF - €0.63 vs €1.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 11% better in Sea of Thieves than Ryzen 3 1200 - 247 vs 222 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1200 - 20 vs 4 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
222
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€140.52
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €140.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
247
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.26/FPS
50%
Price, €
€311.74
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for €311.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |