Buy on Amazon
€140.52
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $109
Availability
MSRP in USD: $109
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $174
Availability
MSRP in USD: $174
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 1200 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-3450 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 1200 is 1915 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-3450.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1200
- Performs up to 5% better in Valorant than Core i5-3450 - 732 vs 696 FPS
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i5-3450 - €140.52 vs €239.68
- Up to 44% better value when playing Valorant than Core i5-3450 - €0.19 vs €0.34 per FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-3450 - 65 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 1200 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen 3 1200
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
732
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€140.52
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD YD1200BBAEBOX AMD Ryzen 3 1200, Processore CPU, 3,1 GHz (3,4 GHz Turbo), Socket AM4, Argento
Buy for €140.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
Intel Core i5-3450 Processore
Buy for €239.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen 3 1200
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Core i5-3450
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 | vs | Intel Core i5-3450 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Summit Ridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
