Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3250 outperforms Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G3250 is 2307 days newer than Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3250 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Performs up to 22% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Phenom X4 9650 - 252 vs 207 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 53 vs 95 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Phenom X4 9650
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Pentium G3250
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Pentium G3250 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Phenom X4 | Collection | Pentium |
| Agena | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 53 W |
| 65 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 11.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
