Key Differences
In short — Pentium G2120 outperforms Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G2120 is 1621 days newer than Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G2120 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G2120
- Performs up to 8% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Phenom X4 9650 - 452 vs 419 FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 55 vs 95 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Phenom X4 9650
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Pentium G2120
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Pentium G2120 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Phenom X4 | Collection | Pentium |
| Agena | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 65 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 11.5x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
