Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KS outperforms Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KS is 5122 days newer than Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Consumes up to 37% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KS - 95 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KS
- Performs up to 52% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Phenom X4 9650 - 157 vs 103 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 24 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €392.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 664 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
238
8.841010401188708%
Multi-Core
765
4.715527337730382%
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KS |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Apr 5th, 2022 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i9 |
Agena | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 150 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
11.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |