Key Differences
In short — Core i5-650 outperforms Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-650 is 651 days newer than Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-650
- Performs up to 5% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Phenom X4 9650 - 90 vs 86 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 73 vs 95 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €148.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65465 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
238
53.00668151447662%
Multi-Core
765
83.51528384279476%
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Core i5-650 |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i5 |
Agena | Codename | Clarkdale |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 73 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
11.5x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |