Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3330 outperforms Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-3330 is 1621 days newer than Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Performs up to 3% better in No Man's Sky than Phenom X4 9650 - 158 vs 153 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 77 vs 95 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Phenom X4 9650
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Core i5-3330
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom X4 9650
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
238
42.88288288288288%
Multi-Core
765
46.5611685940353%
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Core i5-3330 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Agena | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 77 W |
| 65 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 11.5x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
