Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 4044 days newer than Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 22% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Phenom X4 9550 - 135 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 16 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Phenom X4 9550
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Core i9-9900
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom X4 9550
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
234
14.52513966480447%
Multi-Core
712
9.883398112159911%
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Agena | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
