Buy on Amazon
€49.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3820 outperforms Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3820 is 1418 days newer than Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 95 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Performs up to 11% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Phenom X4 9550 - 463 vs 419 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 8 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
463
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€49.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel BX80619I73820 Processore Sandy Bridge E Core i7-3820 (3,6GHz, Sockel 2011)
Buy for €49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 661 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Phenom X4 9550
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | Intel Core i7-3820 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2012 |
| Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Agena | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
| AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 130 W |
| 65 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
