Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 3659 days newer than Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 138% better in League of Legends than Phenom X4 9550 - 69 vs 29 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 54 vs 95 Watts
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Phenom X4 9550
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom X4 9550
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
234
37.98701298701299%
Multi-Core
712
67.74500475737393%
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Phenom X4 | Collection | Celeron |
| Agena | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
