Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1820 outperforms Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1820 is 2075 days newer than Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Performs up to 3% better in Elden Ring than Phenom X4 9550 - 111 vs 108 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 53 vs 95 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Phenom X4 9550
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom X4 9550
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
234
47.657841140529534%
Multi-Core
712
86.3030303030303%
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
| Phenom X4 | Collection | Celeron |
| Agena | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 53 W |
| 65 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
