Key Differences
In short — Core i5-650 outperforms the cheaper Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom II X4 925 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-650 is 241 days newer than the cheaper Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i5-650 - €25.22 vs €157.88
- Up to 84% better value when playing Dishonored 2 than Core i5-650 - €0.1 vs €0.62 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-650
- Performs up to 1% better in Dishonored 2 than Phenom II X4 925 - 255 vs 253 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 73 vs 95 Watts
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
FPS
253
99.2156862745098%
Value, €/FPS
€0.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€25.22
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €25.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FPS
255
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.62/FPS
16.12903225806452%
Price, €
€157.88
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for €157.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | vs | Intel Core i5-650 |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i5 |
Deneb | Codename | Clarkdale |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 73 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |