Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 3431 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 95 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 60% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than Phenom II X4 925 - 99 vs 62 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 48 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
FPS
62
62.62626262626263%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€25.22
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €25.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2536 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Single-Core
320
25.910931174089068%
Multi-Core
930
12.555690562980965%
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Deneb | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 48 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 250 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |