Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 3013 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 5% better in Battlefield 1 than Phenom II X4 925 - 239 vs 227 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 32 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
FPS
227
94.97907949790795%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€25.22
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €25.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Single-Core
320
27.327070879590092%
Multi-Core
930
12.335853561480302%
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Deneb | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |