Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms the cheaper Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom II X4 925 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 3265 days newer than the cheaper Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Up to 88% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600X - €25.22 vs €215.51
- Up to 87% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Ryzen 5 2600X - €0.08 vs €0.63 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 10% better in Overwatch 2 than Phenom II X4 925 - 344 vs 314 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 12 vs 4 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
FPS
314
91.27906976744185%
Value, €/FPS
€0.08/FPS
100%
Price, €
€25.22
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €25.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2383 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
344
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
12.698412698412698%
Price, €
€215.51
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for €215.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2390 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Single-Core
320
25.869037995149558%
Multi-Core
930
17.670530115903478%
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Deneb | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |