Buy on Amazon
€25.22
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $169
Availability
MSRP in USD: $169
No items available
Key Differences
In short — FX-8320 outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8320 is 1261 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Performs up to 1% better in Rocket League than Phenom II X4 925 - 673 vs 668 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 8 vs 4 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Phenom II X4 925
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
FPS
668
99.25705794947994%
Value, €/FPS
€0.04/FPS
100%
Price, €
€25.22
100%
Value Winner
Processore CPU AMD Phenom II X4 925 95W 2,8 GHz Quad-Core HDX925WFK4DGI/HDX925WFK4DGM Presa AM3 SENZA VENTOLA
Buy for €25.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3705 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Phenom II X4 925
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom II X4 925
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Single-Core
320
69.71677559912854%
Multi-Core
930
51.12699285321606%
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
|---|---|---|
| May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Phenom II X4 | Collection | FX |
| Deneb | Codename | Vishera |
| AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 14.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
