Key Differences
In short — FX-8120 outperforms Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8120 is 771 days newer than Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Performs up to 1% better in Overwatch 2 than Phenom II X4 830 - 317 vs 313 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 8 vs 4 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Phenom II X4 830
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
FX-8120
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 830 | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Phenom II X4 | Collection | FX |
| Deneb | Codename | Zambezi |
| AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 14.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
