Key Differences
In short — Core i5-650 outperforms Phenom II X4 810 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-650 is 332 days newer than Phenom II X4 810.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-650
- Performs up to 1% better in Elden Ring than Phenom II X4 810 - 110 vs 109 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 810 - 73 vs 95 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €148.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65467 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Feb 9th, 2009
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 9th, 2009
Single-Core
293
65.25612472160356%
Multi-Core
876
95.63318777292577%
AMD Phenom II X4 810 | vs | Intel Core i5-650 |
---|---|---|
Feb 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i5 |
Deneb | Codename | Clarkdale |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 73 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
13.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |