Key Differences
In short — FX-9590 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-9590 is 324 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Performs up to 1% better in Alan Wake 2 than Celeron G1840 - 100 vs 99 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 56% cheaper than FX-9590 - €72.66 vs €163.64
- Consumes up to 76% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 53 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €163.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76162 minutes ago
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76162 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
505
92.83088235294117%
Multi-Core
854
39.33671119299862%
AMD FX-9590 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Vishera | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
220 W | TDP | 53 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |