Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms FX-9370 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2515 days newer than FX-9370.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 5% better in Dead Space than FX-9370 - 152 vs 145 FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 65 vs 220 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
152
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.93/FPS
100%
Price, €
€141.58
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €141.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18356 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9370 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
4.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |