Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Pentium Gold G6405 outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Pentium Gold G6405 is 3066 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G6405 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6405
- Performs up to 10% better in Rust than FX-8350 - 171 vs 155 FPS
- Up to 72% cheaper than FX-8350 - €79.77 vs €285.0
- Up to 74% better value when playing Rust than FX-8350 - €0.47 vs €1.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 58 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €285 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
171
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€79.77
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €79.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6405 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 58 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |