Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-6600K outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-6600K is 982 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600K - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Performs up to 7% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-8350 - 159 vs 149 FPS
- Up to 34% cheaper than FX-8350 - €188.88 vs €285.0
- Up to 38% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-8350 - €1.19 vs €1.91 per FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 91 vs 125 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €285 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12234 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
159
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€188.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12235 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i5-6600K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 91 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |