Buy on Amazon
€80
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G6405 outperforms FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium Gold G6405 is 2387 days newer than FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G6405 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6405
- Performs up to 3% better in Fortnite than FX-8320E - 218 vs 212 FPS
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 58 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Pentium Gold G6405
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
218
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€80
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Pentium Gold G6405 processor 4.1 GHz 4 MB Smart Cache Box
Buy for €80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FX-8320E
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Pentium Gold G6405
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6405 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| FX | Collection | Pentium Gold |
| Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 58 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
