Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 2947 days newer than FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 3% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than FX-8320E - 195 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 32 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
195
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.66/FPS
100%
Price, €
€517.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €517.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 80 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |