Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

FX-8320E vs Core i9-11900K

FX-8320E vs Core i9-11900K: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-11900K

3.5 GHz | 8-core

Intel Core i9-11900K Logo
Intel® Core™ i9-11900K, processore per sistemi desktop 8 core fino a 5,3 GHz sbloccato senza grafica del processore LGA1200 (chipset Intel® serie 500 e 400 selezionati) 125 W

Buy for 288.66 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 76564 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-11900K

3.5 GHz | 8-core

Intel Core i9-11900K Logo
Intel® Core™ i9-11900K, processore per sistemi desktop 8 core fino a 5,3 GHz sbloccato senza grafica del processore LGA1200 (chipset Intel® serie 500 e 400 selezionati) 125 W

Buy for 288.66 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 76564 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 2387 days newer than FX-8320E.

Advantages of AMD FX-8320E

  • Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 95 vs 125 Watts

Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K

  • Performs up to 20% better in Elden Ring than FX-8320E - 132 vs 110 FPS
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 16 vs 8 threads
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
This is a free version of Elden Ring.
Elden Ring

Elden Ring

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Maximum

AMD FX-8320E Logo
FX-8320E

Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014


FPS

110

83.33333333333334%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

Intel Core i9-11900K Logo
Core i9-11900K

Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021


FPS

132

100%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

€288.66

100%

FPS Winner

Intel® Core™ i9-11900K, processore per sistemi desktop 8 core fino a 5,3 GHz sbloccato senza grafica del processore LGA1200 (chipset Intel® serie 500 e 400 selezionati) 125 W

Buy for 288.66 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 76564 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Maximum

AMD FX-8320E Logo
FX-8320E

Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014

Intel Core i9-11900K Logo
Core i9-11900K

Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

AMD FX-8320E Logo
FX-8320E

Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014


Single-Core

443

18.68409953606073%

Multi-Core

1680

15.34526854219949%

Intel Core i9-11900K Logo
Core i9-11900K

Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021


Single-Core

2371

100%

Multi-Core

10948

100%

AMD FX-8320E Logo

AMD FX-8320E

vs
Intel Core i9-11900K Logo

Intel Core i9-11900K

Sep 2nd, 2014Release Date
Mar 16th, 2021
FXCollectionCore i9
VisheraCodenameRocket Lake
AMD Socket AM3+SocketIntel Socket 1200
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
8Cores8
8Threads
16
3.2 GHzBase Clock Speed
3.5 GHz
4.0 GHzTurbo Clock Speed
5.3 GHz
95 W
TDP125 W
32 nmProcess Size
14 nm
16.0xMultiplier
35.0x
NoneIntegrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 750
YesOverclockableYes

Builds Using FX-8320E or Core i9-11900K

Elden Ring, 1920 x 1080, Maximum

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.