Buy on Amazon
€26.55
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670 outperforms FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4670 is 457 days older than FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670
- Performs up to 6% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than FX-8320E - 289 vs 273 FPS
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 84 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-4670
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
289
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€26.55
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-4670 3.40 GHz Quad-Core Quad-Thread 6 MB Cache 84 W CPU Processore LGA 1150
Buy for €26.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-8320E
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Core i5-4670
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i5-4670 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
| FX | Collection | Core i5 |
| Vishera | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 84 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
