Key Differences
In short — FX-6300 outperforms FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6300 is 679 days older than FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Performs up to 5% better in League of Legends than FX-8320E - 58 vs 55 FPS
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
58
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.67/FPS
100%
Price, €
€38.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €38.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 191 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
AMD FX-8320E | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Vishera | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |