Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 1336 days newer than FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 125 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 4% better in Halo Infinite than FX-8320 - 158 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 12 vs 8 threads
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Xeon E5-1650 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
| FX | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Vishera | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 17.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
