Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

FX-8320 vs Core i9-10900

FX-8320 vs Core i9-10900: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Key Differences

In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 2746 days newer than FX-8320.

Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900

  • Performs up to 28% better in Grand Theft Auto V than FX-8320 - 137 vs 107 FPS
  • Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 20 vs 8 threads
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
This is a free version of Grand Theft Auto V.
Grand Theft Auto V

Grand Theft Auto V

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

AMD FX-8320 Logo
FX-8320

Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012


FPS

107

78.1021897810219%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

Intel Core i9-10900 Logo
Core i9-10900

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020


FPS

137

100%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

€450

100%

FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-10900 processor 2.8 GHz 20 MB Smart Cache Box

Buy for 450 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 75754 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

AMD FX-8320 Logo
FX-8320

Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012

Intel Core i9-10900 Logo
Core i9-10900

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

AMD FX-8320 Logo
FX-8320

Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012


Single-Core

459

26.936619718309856%

Multi-Core

1819

21.60076000475003%

Intel Core i9-10900 Logo
Core i9-10900

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020


Single-Core

1704

100%

Multi-Core

8421

100%

AMD FX-8320 Logo

AMD FX-8320

vs
Intel Core i9-10900 Logo

Intel Core i9-10900

Oct 23rd, 2012Release Date
Apr 30th, 2020
FXCollectionCore i9
VisheraCodenameComet Lake
AMD Socket AM3+SocketIntel Socket 1200
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
8Cores
10
8Threads
20
3.5 GHz
Base Clock Speed2.8 GHz
3.7 GHzTurbo Clock Speed
5.2 GHz
125 WTDP
65 W
32 nmProcess Size
14 nm
17.5xMultiplier
28.0x
NoneIntegrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 630
Yes
OverclockableNo

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.