Buy on Amazon
€25.22
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $169
Availability
MSRP in USD: $169
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — FX-8320 outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8320 is 1261 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Performs up to 1% better in Rocket League than Phenom II X4 925 - 673 vs 668 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Processore CPU AMD Phenom II X4 925 95W 2,8 GHz Quad-Core HDX925WFK4DGI/HDX925WFK4DGM Presa AM3 SENZA VENTOLA
Buy for €25.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 127 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Phenom II X4 925
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom II X4 925
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Single-Core
320
69.71677559912854%
Multi-Core
930
51.12699285321606%
AMD FX-8320 | vs | AMD Phenom II X4 925 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 11th, 2009 |
| FX | Collection | Phenom II X4 |
| Vishera | Codename | Deneb |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 14.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
