Key Differences
In short — FX-8320 outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8320 is 377 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
AMD FX-8320 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| FX | Collection | FX |
| Vishera | Codename | Zambezi |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
