Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 2929 days newer than FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 125 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 7% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-8150 - 160 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 20 vs 8 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
FX-8150
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Core i9-10900X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| FX | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
| Zambezi | Codename | Cascade Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
