Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100T outperforms FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8100T is 2364 days newer than FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Performs up to 7% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than FX-8150 - 239 vs 223 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
239
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€99.94
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €99.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i3-8100T |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |