Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 2878 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 24% better in Battlefield IV than FX-6350 - 462 vs 372 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €288.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75746 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |