Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700 outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700 is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i7-10700 - €49.68 vs €275.65
- Up to 81% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i7-10700 - €0.22 vs €1.13 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700
- Performs up to 7% better in Battlefield 1 than FX-6300 - 244 vs 229 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €49.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3446 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
244
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.13/FPS
19%
Price, €
€275.65
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for €275.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3447 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |