Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12500 outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12500 is 3360 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i5-12500 - €49.68 vs €218.88
- Up to 70% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-12500 - €0.33 vs €1.11 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12500
- Performs up to 30% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-6300 - 197 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
151
76.6497461928934%
Value, €/FPS
€0.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€49.68
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €49.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47773 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
197
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.11/FPS
29.729729729729726%
Price, €
€218.88
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for €218.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47782 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i5-12500 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |