Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7350K outperforms FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7350K is 1533 days newer than FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7350K - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Performs up to 10% better in Elden Ring than FX-6300 - 122 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 37% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 60 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €49.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78082 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i3-7350K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Vishera | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 60 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |