Buy on Amazon
€49.68
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $132
Availability
MSRP in USD: $132
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 1988 days newer than FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 3% better in Ready or Not than FX-6300 - 240 vs 234 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
LANCHY AMD FX-Series FX-6300 CPU Processore Desktop 6-Core 6-Thread Usato 3,5 GHz 8M 95W Socket AM3+
Buy for €49.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FX-6300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| FX | Collection | Celeron |
| Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 17.5x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
