Buy on Amazon
€49.68
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $132
Availability
MSRP in USD: $132
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1820 outperforms the more expensive FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1820 is 404 days newer than the more expensive FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Performs up to 4% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than FX-6300 - 50 vs 48 FPS
- Up to 86% cheaper than FX-6300 - €7.0 vs €49.68
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 53 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
LANCHY AMD FX-Series FX-6300 CPU Processore Desktop 6-Core 6-Thread Usato 3,5 GHz 8M 95W Socket AM3+
Buy for €49.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75470 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G1820 2.70 GHz Dual-Core Dual-Thread 2 MB Cache 53 W CPU Processore LGA 1150
Buy for €7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91357 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
FX-6300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
| FX | Collection | Celeron |
| Vishera | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 53 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 17.5x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
